Skip to content

testing

@alexkroman1/aai/testing — framework-agnostic test helpers for agent code.

A FACADE. The subpath resolves here rather than at testing.ts, which buys two things the direct form could not. That module can be SPLIT as it grows without moving the published entry point — the path an implementation file happens to have is not a thing to promise anyone — and a name it gains next reaches the public surface only when a line is added below, rather than the moment it is written.

Named re-exports rather than export * for the second half of that: the wildcard form re-exports whatever arrives, and needs a noReExportAll suppression the escape-hatch ratchet only lets move down.

commandedBuiltins(config): BuiltinTool[]

Every builtin the system prompt COMMANDS by name, in first-mention order.

The prompt is scanned for snake_case tokens and each is asked of the SDK’s own builtin schema — so run_code and fetch_json are found, and the vs_currencies, per_person and annual_rate a finance prompt names in its endpoints and formulas are not. Reading the CONFIG’s prompt rather than a file: that is what a deploy carries, and it is where system-prompt.md lands only if the build applied it.

Takes only the field it reads, so an AgentConfig passes and so does a { systemPrompt } a spec assembled itself — a resolver’s own text, say.

A reader, not an assertion — expectPromptBuiltinsDeclared is the claim most specs want. This is exported for the spec that wants to say more: that a particular builtin is among the commanded ones, or that the prompt commands exactly the set the template is about.

It reads what the CONFIG carries, which for a RESOLVER is nothing. AgentDef.systemPrompt may be a function, and toAgentConfig cannot serialize one — it drops the field and the schema fills in DEFAULT_SYSTEM_PROMPT — so a config converted from a resolver-based agent hands this function the FRAMEWORK’s prompt and gets [] back, which is a true answer to the wrong question. Nothing here can tell that config from one whose author simply wrote no prompt; the def can, which is why the check that refuses is expectPromptBuiltinsDeclared and not this reader. To scan a resolver’s own text, resolve it and substitute it: commandedBuiltins({ systemPrompt: resolver(ctx) }).

import { agent } from "@alexkroman1/aai";
import { toAgentConfig } from "@alexkroman1/aai/manifest";
import { commandedBuiltins } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const config = toAgentConfig(
agent({ name: "Penny", systemPrompt: "Use fetch_json for rates; annual_rate is a number." }),
);
console.log(commandedBuiltins(config)); // ["fetch_json"]

string

BuiltinTool[]


createProgressStream(lines?): ReadableStream<unknown>

The progress channel of a run, from the read side — what ctx.workflows.stream resolves with.

Closes after the given lines, which is what makes a tool that drains it terminate. A run’s real stream never closes (no step knows it is the last one), and the tool bounds itself with streamTail instead — so a spec that wants to exercise THAT bound stubs streamTail, not this.

readonly unknown[]

ReadableStream<unknown>

import { createProgressStream, createStubWorkflows } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const workflows = createStubWorkflows({
streamTail: () => Promise.resolve(0),
stream: () => Promise.resolve(createProgressStream(["Reading the sources…"])),
});

createRunSnapshot<R>(overrides?): WorkflowRunSnapshot<R>

Build a WorkflowRunSnapshot — the right arm of the union, without a cast.

Defaults to a running run, which is the state a tool that has just started one reads back.

R = unknown

RunSnapshotOverrides<R>

WorkflowRunSnapshot<R>

import { createRunSnapshot, createStubWorkflows } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const workflows = createStubWorkflows({
find: () => Promise.resolve([createRunSnapshot({ status: "failed", error: "gateway down" })]),
});

createStubWorkflows(overrides?): WorkflowClient

A ctx.workflows for testing a tool that starts or reads durable runs: every method rejects by default, and overrides replaces the ones the test drives.

The alternative is a cast, and the cast is what goes wrong. A complete WorkflowClient is eight methods, of which a tool’s test usually drives one or two, so the hand-rolled version is a literal with as WorkflowClient — which keeps compiling when the client GAINS a method and leaves that method undefined. Two shipped templates had exactly that, and adding wakeUp and stream to the client is what surfaced it: the casts still compiled.

Rejecting rather than no-op defaults, for the reason createUnusedDb rejected before it went away with ctx.db — a tool that reaches for a method the test did not stub should say so, not silently receive undefined. listing is the exception and returns [], because it is synchronous and an empty list is a truthful answer.

import { createStubWorkflows, createToolContext } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const workflows = createStubWorkflows({ start: async () => "wrun_1" });
const ctx = createToolContext({ workflows });

Partial<WorkflowClient>

WorkflowClient


createToolContext(overrides?): TestToolContext

Build a ToolContext for testing a tool’s execute in isolation.

Defaults are chosen so the context is inert: empty env, an empty slot store, workflows, generate and delegate that reject with a message naming themselves, a signal that never aborts, and a send that records. Override any of them.

generate and delegate also take a SCRIPT, which is the way in for a tool that calls a model: pass stubGenerate’s own argument and the fake is built here, installed, and handed back on ctx.model (ctx.desk for delegate). scriptedToolContext is the same thing under a name that says both seams are scripted, and returns the two fakes beside the context.

Each call is a distinct session. sessionId auto-increments, which is what makes the two-context isolation test — the same tool run against two contexts must not share state — read the way it does. Pass sessionId explicitly when a test needs two contexts to be the SAME session (a reconnect, a keyed lock).

An override may be undefined, which means “I do not have one” and leaves the default in place — see ToolContextOverrides for why that is not Partial<ToolContext>.

There is no state type parameter, because there is no ctx.state bag to type: a slot types its own value in the module that declares it, and reading the slot back is how a spec asserts what a tool wrote.

ToolContextOverrides

TestToolContext

// `no-check`: the tool under test is in another file, which is the point.
import { createToolContext } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { expect, test } from "vitest";
import { cartSlot } from "./shared.ts";
import addItem from "./tools/add_item.ts";
test("add_item appends to this session's cart", async () => {
const ctx = createToolContext();
await addItem.execute({ item: "apple" }, ctx);
expect(cartSlot.get(ctx).items).toEqual(["apple"]);
});

Asserting on what a tool sent

import { createToolContext } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { expect, test } from "vitest";
import { recommend } from "./tools/recommend.ts";
test("recommend pushes its picks to the client", async () => {
const ctx = createToolContext();
await recommend.execute({ mood: "chill" }, ctx);
expect(ctx.sent).toEqual([{ event: "recommendations", data: expect.anything() }]);
});

Scripting the model in the same call

import { createToolContext } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
// `{ reply }` answers every call; `{ routes }`, keyed by system prompt,
// answers a tool that plays more than one model role.
const ctx = createToolContext({ generate: { reply: "A short summary." } });
// … run the tool, then assert on what it asked:
// expect(ctx.model.calls.map((call) => call.prompt)).toEqual([…]);

createWorkflowContext(options?): WorkflowContextRecorder

Build a WorkflowContext that runs a body and records what it asked for.

WorkflowContextOptions

WorkflowContextRecorder

const ctx = createWorkflowContext();
const output = await digestFlow({ url: "https://example.com/a" }, ctx);
expect(output.headline).toBe("");
expect(ctx.steps.map((s) => s.name)).toEqual(["fetchArticle", "summarize", "file"]);
expect(ctx.slept).toEqual([{ label: "settle", until: 10_000 }]);

deployedAgent<D>(authored, project): D

The def a DEPLOYED agent runs: the one agent.ts exports, plus the tools its tools/ directory declares, plus what its system-prompt.md says.

This is one call because forgetting HALF of it is the failure it exists to prevent, and that failure is silent. Neither lowering is applied by agent() — both are applied by the BUILD (aai build enumerates tools/ and resolves the prompt file) — so a spec or an eval driving the raw default export measures an agent with NO TOOLS and the FRAMEWORK-DEFAULT system prompt. Nothing fails: the model answers plausibly out of its own knowledge, every case that asserts a sentence still passes, and the suite reports green on a different agent than the one anybody deploys. It produced four bogus green eval results in one day, and the two nested wrappers it replaces — a tools lowering inside a prompt lowering, written out in seventeen template evals — are exactly the shape where one of the two goes missing under an edit.

Under vitest, prefer import agentDef from "virtual:aai/agent", which is this call made for you against the importing spec’s own directory (see the module doc). Reach for this one when the runner is not vitest, or when the lowering itself is the subject of the spec.

An EMPTY tools glob throws. That is the same bug wearing its other face: import.meta.glob("./tool/*.ts") (or a tools/ directory that moved) matches nothing, and lowering nothing onto the def is indistinguishable from not lowering at all. A project with no tools omits the field instead, which is a statement rather than an accident.

// `no-check`: two of these imports are files YOU own — `./agent.ts` and
// `./system-prompt.md?raw` — which exist in your project and in no tree of
// ours, so nothing here can resolve them. (`import.meta.glob` is not the
// blocker: the doc-example gate compiles against the scaffold's own
// `global.d.ts`, which carries `/// <reference types="vite/client" />`.)
import { deployedAgent } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import authored from "./agent.ts";
import systemPrompt from "./system-prompt.md?raw";
const agentDef = deployedAgent(authored, {
tools: import.meta.glob("./tools/*.ts", { eager: true }),
systemPrompt,
});

Every rule the build applies applies here too, and each is an error naming the file: the tool-name grammar, the default-export requirement, no nested files, a name declared twice, an empty prompt file, and a system-prompt.md that exists while agent.ts declares a different prompt STRING — the “I edited the prompt and nothing changed” failure.

Bounded by the two fields it lowers ONTO, not by AgentDef. An agent() def satisfies it and comes back as its own type, so a template keeps its exported workflow types; the bound says what the function reads, and keeps AgentDef and everything behind it off @alexkroman1/aai/testing’s contract.

D extends ToolBearingAgent & object

D

ProjectFiles

D


dialogRefusalPattern(state?): RegExp

A pattern matching the sentence a dialog() gate refuses with — optionally pinned to the state it names.

For a SPEC. A gated tool called out of state answers a ToolFailure whose error is this sentence, and every template spec that asserts a gate held used to spell a regex for it by hand. Two kinds of spec read it, and the pattern serves both: a unit test holds the ToolFailure itself (prefer expectDialogRefused there, which also throws on a success), while an eval reads a tool result off the event stream as a SERIALIZED string, where the state’s quotes arrive escaped (\"identifying\"). The pattern admits the escaping, so one matcher reads both.

With no state, it matches any refusal — for a spec that pins the state a line later, or whose subject is that the body did not run rather than where the conversation was.

string

The state the refusal must name, as DialogPosition.state spells it ("identifying", "onCall.inbox"). Matched literally.

RegExp

import { dialogRefusalPattern } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const refused = 'Not available yet: this conversation is at "identifying". Verify the caller first.';
dialogRefusalPattern("identifying").test(refused); // true
dialogRefusalPattern("transferred").test(refused); // false
dialogRefusalPattern().test(refused); // true

dialogResultSchema<T>(result): ZodObject<{ done: ZodBoolean; instruction: ZodOptional<ZodString>; result: T; state: ZodString; }, $strip>

The envelope a gated tool answers with, as a schema around the tool’s own.

expectDialogOk unwraps a value a spec HOLDS. An eval holds the serialized copy the model was handed and reads it back through a schema — toolResultIn(turn.toolCalls, "set_stay", schema) — so it needs the same envelope as a schema rather than as a function, and three shipped evals had each written it out: z.object({ result, state: z.string(), done: z.boolean() }), under a comment saying the shape was the SDK’s. It is, and this is where it lives: result is whatever the author’s execute returned, state is where the call landed, done whether that state is final, and instruction is the state’s own brief when it declares one — the fields of DialogToolResult, which a dialog.tool writes and no tool file does.

Parsing rather than casting is what makes a template that stopped carrying its position fail naming the field, instead of a later expect reading undefined.state.

T extends ZodType<unknown, unknown, $ZodTypeInternals<unknown, unknown>>

The schema of the tool’s OWN result, under result.

T

What the tool’s execute answers with.

ZodObject<{ done: ZodBoolean; instruction: ZodOptional<ZodString>; result: T; state: ZodString; }, $strip>

import { dialogResultSchema } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { z } from "zod";
// In an eval: `toolResultIn(turn.toolCalls, "set_stay", Stay)`. Holding the
// serialized result yourself, it is the same parse:
const Stay = dialogResultSchema(z.object({ options: z.string() }));
const stay = Stay.parse(
JSON.parse('{"result":{"options":"garden view"},"state":"booking.room","done":false}'),
);
stay.state; // "booking.room"
stay.result.options; // "garden view"

eventsOf<E, K>(events, type): Extract<E, { type: K; }>[]

Every event in events named type, in order, typed as that member.

import type { SessionEvent } from "@alexkroman1/aai";
import { eventsOf } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
declare const recorded: SessionEvent[];
const calls = eventsOf(recorded, "tool.called");
console.log(calls.map((e) => e.toolName));

E extends object

K extends string

Iterable<E>

K

Extract<E, { type: K; }>[]


expectDeployable<D>(def): DeployedConfig

Run the invariants a deployable agent owes, and hand back the RESOLVED config so a spec can go on to assert its own specifics — a chosen model, a declared builtin — without converting twice.

Three invariants, each thrown by name:

  • The config passes manifest validation — the same toAgentConfig that aai build and aai deploy run, so an invalid provider combination or tuning fails here rather than at the first live session.
  • The platform can name it — there IS a name, and the conversion carries it through. Not the literal: renaming the agent is the first edit a starter invites, and the studio lists a deployed agent by exactly this string.
  • Every stage its mode needs is filled, declared or defaulted — asserted per MODE so it survives a swap. A pipeline agent has an stt, llm and tts kind, each declared stage surviving as declared and each unset one filled by defaultProviders; a text agent has no audio stage (its llm may be absent — createTextAgent defaults the one stage it has); an s2s agent has an s2s kind and NO cascade, since speech-to-speech replaces the pipeline rather than joining it — the one thing that must never happen by fallthrough.

toAgentConfig already refuses most of the states the second and third invariants describe (a blank name, s2s beside a pipeline stage). They are checked here anyway, and BEFORE or AFTER the conversion as the message needs, because the value of this helper is the sentence: a spec that failed on “expected function not to throw” has to re-run the conversion by hand to learn which invariant went.

import { agent } from "@alexkroman1/aai";
import { expectDeployable } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const config = expectDeployable(agent({ name: "Desk", builtinTools: ["run_code"] }));
// The invariants held; now the template's own claim.
console.log(config.builtinTools); // ["run_code"]

D extends object

D

The agent under test — an agent() definition, or the raw default export of an agent.ts. Structural: only name is required of the TYPE, because validating the rest is this helper’s job at run time — the same toAgentConfig a deploy runs. Generic only so a spread literal carrying a field this type does not name ({ ...def, maxSteps: 0 }) is not an excess-property error.

DeployedConfig

The config a deploy carries, mode derived and defaults injected — see DeployedConfig for the fields it names.

Naming the invariant that failed, and — for the validation one — the sentence toAgentConfig wrote about the field.


expectDialogOk<T>(result): DialogToolResult<T>

The same unwrap as expectToolOk, keeping WHERE the dialog landed.

The half a spec needs when the assertion is about the conversation rather than about the tool’s own value — that a call advanced the machine into quote.pending, that a final state reports done. expectToolOk() is this with .result taken off the end.

T

What the tool’s execute returns, under result.

unknown

DialogToolResult<T>

As expectToolOk does, and for the same reasons.

import { expectDialogOk, runTool } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const answered = expectDialogOk<{ quoted: number }>(
await runTool(agentDef, "quote", {}, ctx),
);
expect(answered.state).toBe("quote.pending");
expect(answered.result.quoted).toBe(42);

expectDialogRefused(result, state?): ToolFailure

The refusal a gated tool answered with, or a throw saying the gate did NOT hold.

The mirror of expectDialogOk, for the spec whose subject is that a tool was REFUSED: called before the dialog reached its state, or after it left. Six template specs had written the other half by hand — an isToolFailure check, a toBe(true), and a regex for the sentence the gate writes — and a success slipped through that shape as three assertions that never ran, because each sat inside the if the guard opened.

With a state, the refusal must also NAME it: that the tool was refused is half the claim, and that the conversation was where the spec thinks it was is the half a gate on the wrong state hides in. Matched with dialogRefusalPattern, so a spec never spells the sentence.

unknown

What runTool / toolOf(...).execute(...) answered.

string

The position the refusal must name, as DialogPosition.state spells it. Omit to accept a refusal at any state.

ToolFailure

When the tool was NOT refused — a dialog envelope is reported with the state it landed in, since that is the fact the spec got wrong.

When it was refused for some other reason, or at some other state, quoting the refusal.

import { expectDialogRefused } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const refused = expectDialogRefused(
{ error: 'Not available yet: this conversation is at "idle". Call start_plan first.' },
"idle",
);
refused.error.includes("start_plan"); // true — the instruction the model recovers from

expectPromptBuiltinsDeclared(def): BuiltinTool[]

Every builtin the prompt commands is one builtinTools declares — or a throw naming the ones that are not.

The pairing a prompt-driven template is made of: the prose holds the rules (“you MUST use run_code for arithmetic”, “look rates up with fetch_json”), and agent.ts holds the array that makes those tools exist. The failure is silent in both directions and shows up in a diff of neither file — a prompt commanding fetch_json at an agent that never declared it produces a model apologizing for a tool it cannot see, and a builtin dropped from agent.ts alone leaves an endpoint list addressed to nothing.

A prompt commanding NO builtin is a failure, not a pass. Non-vacuity earns its keep twice: a loop over nothing asserts nothing, and it is also the state a template lands in when system-prompt.md was not applied — the framework default names no builtin, so “I edited the prompt and nothing changed” fails here instead of passing quietly with the template’s rules nowhere in its context. A spec whose prompt legitimately describes its tools rather than naming them does not want this helper; it asserts on builtinTools directly.

The converse is deliberately NOT asserted: declaring a builtin the prompt never mentions is an ordinary edit, and the model learns about it from its own tool schema rather than from the prose.

A RESOLVER is CALLED, and refused when it cannot be. systemPrompt may be a function, and toAgentConfig drops one rather than putting it on the wire — so scanning the converted config would read the FRAMEWORK’s default prompt and report on a prompt this agent never sends. That is the one outcome a check may not have: the default names no builtin, so scanning it fails for the wrong reason — pointing at an unapplied system-prompt.md that is not the problem — and PASSES the day the default happens to name one. So the resolver is called with a bare createToolContext — a fresh session id, no env, an empty slot store — and its answer is what gets scanned. That is enough for the prose half, which is a ?raw import closed over by the function and does not vary with session state. A resolver that cannot answer from a bare context (it reads an env var, or a slot it expects seeded) THROWS, and this refuses by name rather than falling back to the default: seed a context and scan the text yourself with commandedBuiltins, or assert on builtinTools directly.

import { agent } from "@alexkroman1/aai";
import { expectPromptBuiltinsDeclared } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const commanded = expectPromptBuiltinsDeclared(
agent({
name: "Coda",
systemPrompt: "Answer every sum by calling run_code.",
builtinTools: ["run_code"],
}),
);
console.log(commanded); // ["run_code"]

The agent under test — only its systemPrompt and builtinTools are read, so an agent() def passes as it is. Whether the WHOLE def converts is expectDeployable’s claim, not this one’s.

readonly BuiltinTool[]

AgentSystemPrompt

BuiltinTool[]

The commanded builtins, for a spec that wants to say more about them.

When the prompt names no builtin, when it names one builtinTools lacks, or when a systemPrompt resolver cannot answer from a bare context.


expectToolOk<T>(result): T

The value a gated tool’s own execute returned, or a throw naming the refusal.

T

What the tool’s execute returns. Unchecked at runtime, like any assertion about a value crossing a unknown boundary — this recovers the type the lookup path cannot, it does not validate it.

unknown

What runTool / toolOf(...).execute(...) answered.

T

When the tool refused (ToolFailure), quoting the refusal — which for a dialog() tool is the sentence naming the state the conversation is actually in and what has to happen first.

When the value is not a tool result envelope at all, which is what a plain tool() answers: use its return value directly, there is nothing to unwrap.

// `no-check`: the agent under test is in another file, which is the point.
import { expectToolOk, runTool } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const order = expectToolOk<{ id: string }>(
await runTool(agentDef, "place_order", {}, ctx),
);
expect(order.id).toBe("ord_1");

isEvent<E, K>(event, type): event is Extract<E, { type: K }>

Whether event is the one named type — a type guard, so the branch it guards reads that member’s fields without a cast.

import type { SessionEvent } from "@alexkroman1/aai";
import { isEvent } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
declare const recorded: SessionEvent[];
const last = recorded.at(-1);
if (last && isEvent(last, "tool.called")) console.log(last.toolName);

E extends object

K extends string

E

K

event is Extract<E, { type: K }>


parseSchemaInput<T>(schema, value, what?): Promise<T>

Validate value against schema, or throw naming every issue.

T = Record<string, unknown>

What the schema produces. Defaults to Record<string, unknown>, which is what a tool input schema is declared as.

StandardSchemaV1<unknown, unknown> | undefined

A Standard Schema, or undefined — the shape tool.inputSchema and workflow.input both have. undefined is an ERROR rather than a pass, because “this declares no schema” is a different fact from “the schema accepted it” and a spec asserting the second must not be satisfied by the first.

unknown

string

How the schema is named in a failure. Defaults to "the schema"; pass the tool or workflow name where one is at hand.

Promise<T>

When the schema refuses value, with the issues rendered as one line (quantity: too small; size: invalid enum value) — which is what makes the failure readable at all, since a raw issue array prints as [Object].

import { parseSchemaInput } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const parsed = await parseSchemaInput<{ voice: string }>(myWorkflow.input, {
recording: "upl_1",
voice: "jane",
});
expect(parsed.voice).toBe("jane");

parseToolInput<T>(agent, name, value): Promise<T>

Validate value against the input schema of the tool name.

parseSchemaInput with the lookup done — including toolOf’s “no such tool” sentence, which names the tools that DO exist, since a lookup that misses is nearly always a rename.

T = Record<string, unknown>

What the schema produces.

ToolBearingAgent

string

unknown

Promise<T>

When the agent declares no tool called name (see toolOf), when that tool declares no inputSchema, or when the schema refuses value.

import agentDef from "virtual:aai/agent";
import { parseToolInput } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { expect } from "vitest";
const parsed = await parseToolInput<{ quantity: number }>(agentDef, "add_pizza", {
size: "small",
crust: "thin",
toppings: [],
});
// The schema's own default, which is the thing worth asserting here.
expect(parsed.quantity).toBe(1);

routeStepFetch(routes, options?): (request) => StubStepAnswer

Compose several StepRoutes into the one handler stubStepFetch takes.

Publishing a stepFetch REPLACES, so a flow that calls a model AND fetches a page AND transcribes can install exactly one fake and has to route inside it. Thirteen sites across seven templates wrote that composition by hand, and they did not agree on the part that matters — the unmatched case. Three threw (with a byte-identical message), two answered 404, and six fell through to a second fake.

The default is "throw" because the alternatives HIDE a finding. A 404 for a request nobody set up reads to the run as a provider that refused, so the flow takes its own error path and the spec passes green having tested the wrong branch. A spec that really is about a 404 says so.

Order matters: the first route to answer wins, so put the most specific leg first. A route that throws is left alone — this only decides what happens when every leg answers undefined.

readonly StepRoute[]

StepUnmatched

(request) => StubStepAnswer

import { routeStepFetch, stubGatewayRoute } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const model = stubGatewayRoute(['{"summary":"ok"}']);
// Model first, then the page; anything else is a finding.
const handler = routeStepFetch([model.route, (req) =>
req.url.startsWith("https://example.test") ? { body: "<p>hi</p>" } : undefined,
]);

runGuardrail(def, text, answer?): GuardrailVerdict

Run def’s guardrail over one answer and return its verdict.

The answer is text with a ZERO cost report — one step, no tool calls — because that is what most guardrails read; a guardrail that judges the cost (toolCalls.length === 0, say) is handed it through answer, which is spread over the defaults.

Throws when the def declares no guardrail, rather than returning true: a spec calling this is asserting that a check exists, and a def that lost its guardrail should fail here, not pass by default. Throws when the guardrail returns a promise: this helper is for the SYNCHRONOUS guardrail, which is the ordinary one, and an async guardrail’s spec awaits def.guardrail(answer) itself — the verdict is then a promise a test can await, and nothing here would add to that.

SubagentDef

string

Partial<SubagentAnswer>

GuardrailVerdict

import { subagent } from "@alexkroman1/aai";
import { runGuardrail } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const checker = subagent({
name: "fact-checker",
systemPrompt: "Open with Confirmed:, Contradicted: or Unclear:.",
guardrail: ({ text }) => /^(Confirmed|Contradicted|Unclear):/.test(text) || "Open with a verdict word.",
});
runGuardrail(checker, "Confirmed: the figure is 12%."); // true
runGuardrail(checker, "It seems prices fell."); // "Open with a verdict word."

runTool<T>(tool, argsOrCtx?, ctx?): Promise<Awaited<ReturnType<T["execute"]>>>

Run a tool — the tool DEF itself, or by the name the model calls it by.

Handed the tool, it is TYPED end to end: the arguments are checked against what execute takes and the result is what it returns, so await runTool(addItem, { item: "apple" }, ctx) needs no cast. The name form below answers unknown, because a name is a string and nothing can type what it looks up; a spec reading fields off that result used to cast it ((await run("add_item", ctx)) as { added: string }), which is an unchecked claim that stops meaning anything the day the tool’s return changes. A tool FILE’s default export is the very object a deployed agent registers under its name, so importing it runs the same code the name would reach.

Matched on execute alone rather than on ToolDef, so any tool shape — tool(), slot.tool(), dialog.tool() — is accepted and keeps its own result type.

T extends object

T

ToolContext | Parameters<T["execute"]>[0]

ToolContext

Promise<Awaited<ReturnType<T["execute"]>>>

import { tool } from "@alexkroman1/aai";
import { createToolContext, runTool } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { z } from "zod";
// In a spec this is `import addItem from "./tools/add_item.ts"`.
const addItem = tool({
description: "Add an item",
inputSchema: z.object({ item: z.string() }),
execute: async ({ item }) => ({ added: item }),
});
const { added } = await runTool(addItem, { item: "apple" }, createToolContext());
console.log(added.toUpperCase()); // typed: `added` is a string

runTool(agent, name, argsOrCtx?, ctx?): Promise<unknown>

Run a tool by the name the model calls it by.

args is unvalidated on purpose: the runtime parses a model’s arguments against inputSchema BEFORE execute sees them, so a spec that pre-validated would be testing a path the tool never runs on. Pass the arguments the tool body expects to receive. (To test the SCHEMA itself, which is a different question, use parseToolInput / toolInputIssues.)

The def to pass is the one a DEPLOYED agent runs — virtual:aai/agent under vitest, or deployedAgent under any other runner, since a tool is a file and agent.ts’s default export carries none. See toolOf, which this is built on.

A tool that takes no arguments may say so by leaving them out, passing the context in their place: runTool(agentDef, "view_order", ctx). A no-argument tool is common — one shipped template has thirteen — and the {} those calls were obliged to pass appeared 66 times across seven template specs, always between the two values a reader actually cares about. Both spellings are one signature rather than an overload pair, so a bound runner forwards either shape without restating the union — which is what toolRunner is, and how every template reaches this.

The two are told apart by SHAPE, and the probe is narrow enough to be safe: a ToolContext is a record carrying a string sessionId, a slots store and a send function, and tool arguments arrive as JSON from a model, which cannot contain a function. A context is never a plausible argument object.

ToolBearingAgent

string

Record<string, unknown> | ToolContext

ToolContext

The context. Defaults to a fresh createToolContext — so an omitted context is a DISTINCT SESSION with empty slots, which is what a stateless tool wants and never what two calls sharing state want. Pass one explicitly wherever the second call is supposed to see the first call’s work.

Promise<unknown>

import agentDef from "virtual:aai/agent";
import { createToolContext, runTool } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { expect } from "vitest";
expect(await runTool(agentDef, "add_item", { item: "apple" }, createToolContext())).toEqual({
added: "apple",
});
// No arguments, one session shared across the two calls.
const ctx = createToolContext();
await runTool(agentDef, "add_item", { item: "apple" }, ctx);
expect(await runTool(agentDef, "view_order", ctx)).toEqual({ items: ["apple"] });

schemaInputIssues(schema, value, what?): Promise<readonly StandardSchemaIssue[] | undefined>

The issues schema found in value, or undefined when it accepted it.

The negative half of parseSchemaInput, and undefined-on-success is deliberate: expect(await schemaInputIssues(…)).toBeUndefined() is the accepting case and …toBeDefined() the refusing one, which is the pair every hand-rolled site was already writing against .issues.

StandardSchemaV1<unknown, unknown> | undefined

As parseSchemaInput: undefined throws rather than reporting “no issues”, which would make a negative test pass for a schema that does not exist.

unknown

string

How the schema is named in that error.

Promise<readonly StandardSchemaIssue[] | undefined>

import { schemaInputIssues } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
expect(await schemaInputIssues(myWorkflow.input, { voice: "not-a-voice" })).toBeDefined();

scriptedToolContext(options?): ScriptedToolContext

Build a TestToolContext whose generate and delegate are both scripted, and hand back the fakes beside it.

createToolContext is the way in now. Its generate and delegate take the same scripts and expose the same fakes on the context (ctx.model, ctx.desk), so one call covers scripting either seam, both, or neither. This stays for the spec that reads the two fakes by name — const { ctx, model, desk } = scriptedToolContext(…).

Each call is a distinct session, as with createToolContext. A spec that wants two sessions sharing one script calls this twice with the same routes object — the routes are read at call time, so a function route with its own queue is shared and a fixed route is not affected either way.

ScriptedToolContextOptions

ScriptedToolContext

import { scriptedToolContext } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const TRIAGE = "You triage email.";
const { ctx, model, desk } = scriptedToolContext({
generate: { routes: { [TRIAGE]: { object: { response: "email" } } } },
delegate: { routes: { "meeting-assistant": "Free Wednesday 1pm." } },
});
// … run the tool against `ctx`, then:
// expect(model.calls.map((call) => call.system)).toEqual([TRIAGE]);
// expect(desk.calls[0]?.subagent.name).toBe("meeting-assistant");

stubDelegate(script): StubDelegate

Build a fake ctx.delegate from a script: one reply, or routes keyed by subagent name.

Pass { reply } to answer every delegation the same way, which is what a one-subagent tool wants.

StubDelegateScript

StubDelegate

Two subagents, one queue

import { createToolContext, stubDelegate } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const findings = ["Rain on Tuesday.", "Clear on Wednesday."];
const desk = stubDelegate({
routes: {
researcher: () => ({ text: findings.shift() ?? "Nothing found.", steps: 3 }),
"fact-checker": "Both claims check out.",
},
});
const ctx = createToolContext({ delegate: desk.delegate });
// … run the tool, then assert on who was asked what:
// expect(desk.calls.map((call) => call.subagent.name)).toEqual([…]);

stubGateway(replies, options?): StubGateway

Build a fake LLM gateway answering replies in order.

The LAST reply repeats once the list runs out, so a spec names only the turns it cares about — which is what makes this usable for a step whose model call sits in a LOOP: a stub that says the same thing every turn can only ever drive such a loop into its budget, and one that runs out mid-loop fails on the stub rather than on the code.

string | readonly string[]

Completion contents, in order. A bare string is one reply.

StubGatewayOptions

StubGateway

// `no-check`: the step under test is in another file, which is the point.
import { stubGateway } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { expect, test, vi } from "vitest";
import { summarize } from "./workflows/digest.ts";
test("summarize sends the article and returns the headline", async () => {
const gateway = stubGateway(['{"headline":"Otters use tools"}']);
vi.stubGlobal("fetch", gateway.fetch);
vi.stubEnv("ASSEMBLYAI_API_KEY", "sk-test");
expect(await summarize("Otters use tools.")).toEqual({ headline: "Otters use tools" });
expect(gateway.calls[0]?.prompt).toContain("Otters use tools.");
});

stubGatewayRoute(replies, options?): StubGatewayRoute

A gateway reply for a step that goes through the PUBLISHED stepFetch slot rather than the global fetch.

stubGateway answers over globalThis.fetch, which is the wrong seam whenever anything has published a stepFetch: publishing REPLACES, so a flow that transcribes AND calls a model — or fetches a page and calls a model — can install only one fake and has to route by URL inside it. Seven eval files did exactly that, and each hand-typed the same two things:

  1. The envelope. { body: { choices: [{ message: { content } }] } }, written out six times in six spellings. It is a WIRE shape, so a typo in it does not fail — stepGenerate reads no content and reports an empty completion, i.e. the fake and the code under test disagree and the case blames the code.
  2. The cursor. contents.at(Math.min(next, contents.length - 1)), re-derived twice, because a model call inside a LOOP cannot know how many calls it will make: a script that repeats one line can only drive the loop into its budget, and one that runs out mid-loop fails on the script. The last reply repeats, which is stubGateway’s convention and now literally the same code.

And it hands back DECODED calls — prompt, system, body, headers — which is the half no hand-rolled version had. Reading what the model was ASKED off a StubStepRequest means String(call.body), i.e. the raw JSON of the whole request; one eval asserted its prompts that way and was really asserting against the serialized model and temperature too.

// `no-check`: the step under test is in another file, which is the point.
import { stubGatewayRoute } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { installStubStepFetch } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing/vitest";
const model = stubGatewayRoute(['{"verdict":"ship"}']);
installStubStepFetch((request) => model.route(request) ?? { body: PAGE_HTML });
// … run the workflow …
expect(model.calls[0]?.prompt).toContain("the brief");

string | readonly string[]

Completion contents, in order; the last repeats. A bare string is one reply.

StubGatewayOptions

StubGatewayRoute


stubGenerate(script): StubGenerate

Build a fake ctx.generate from a script: one reply, or routes keyed by system prompt.

A call whose system prompt names no route throws, naming it — an unscripted model call is a spec that has drifted from the tool, not a case to paper over. Pass { reply } to answer every call the same way, which is what a one-model tool wants.

StubGenerateScript

StubGenerate

Two model roles, one queue

import { createToolContext, stubGenerate } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const verdicts = ["yes", "no"];
const model = stubGenerate({
routes: {
"You grade documents.": () => ({ object: { score: verdicts.shift() ?? "yes" } }),
"You answer questions.": "The documented answer.",
},
});
const ctx = createToolContext({ generate: model.generate });
// … run the tool, then assert on the roles it played:
// expect(model.calls.map((call) => call.system)).toEqual([…]);

One model role

import { stubGenerate } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const model = stubGenerate({ reply: { object: { steps: ["Only step"] } } });
const answerer = stubGenerate({ reply: "The documented answer." });

stubReporter(): StubReporter

Capture what a step narrates and emits.

stepReport() and stepEmit() both go through a published slot, and with nothing published they fall back to the console — which is right for a step under test that nobody is asserting on, and useless the moment the narration IS the subject. It is for a step whose partial results are part of its contract: a fan-out that emits each segment as it lands has a page depending on the shape of those chunks, and nothing else in a spec can see them.

The two are separated the way the streams are, so a spec asserting a chunk never has to filter the sentences out of it.

const reported = stubReporter();
afterEach(reported.restore);
await transcribeSegment(uploadId, format, segment);
expect(reported.emitted).toEqual([
{ namespace: "transcript", chunk: { index: 0, text: "hello there" } },
]);

Publishing REPLACES, so a spec that forgets to restore leaves this one answering the next file’s steps — the same rule stubStepFetch follows, and the same remedy.

StubReporter


stubSpeech(options?): StubSpeech

Publish a synthesizer that records what it was asked to say and answers with silence.

Silence rather than a tone, because nothing downstream of a step listens: a spec asserts on the TEXT that was spoken, the duration, and where the bytes went. Generating audible audio would only make the fixtures bigger.

StubSpeechOptions

StubSpeech


stubStepDelegate(script): StubStepDelegate

PUBLISH a fake runner, so an exported step that calls stepDelegate can be driven without a host.

stubDelegate with the slot filled in, and deliberately nothing more: the step-side and tool-side capabilities have the same signature because they are the same runner bound differently, so a spec routes them the same way and a template that moves a subagent from a tool into a step rewrites no fake.

An unpublished slot THROWS rather than degrading (see sdk/step-delegate.ts), which is what makes this the ONE way to test such a step — and why the failure an author meets first names this function.

StubDelegateScript

StubStepDelegate

import { stubStepDelegate } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const desk = stubStepDelegate({ routes: { researcher: "Prices fell 12% in 2025." } });
try {
// … call the exported step, then assert on `desk.calls`
} finally {
desk.restore();
}

stubStepFetch(answer?): StubStepFetch

Publish a fake stepFetch, so a step’s HTTP can be asserted without a server and without stubbing a global.

A step’s outbound call goes through a process-wide slot rather than globalThis.fetch (see stepFetch on @alexkroman1/aai/step for why — HTTP/1.1 pinning, and a fan-out that breaks on HTTP/2 stream resets), so this is the honest way to intercept it. vi.stubGlobal("fetch", …) still works, because an unpublished slot falls back to the global; it just tests a path production does not take, and it cannot see the request BODY as bytes.

answer may return a Response, or a { status, body, headers } shorthand, or throw — a throw is what a connection failure looks like, and stepFetch wraps it in a StepTransportError exactly as it would in production.

Returns restore, and calling it in an afterEach is not optional — a fetch left published makes the next file’s steps answer to this one’s handler. installStubStepFetch (@alexkroman1/aai/testing/vitest) is the same fake with that registration already done.

(request) => StubStepAnswer | Promise<StubStepAnswer>

Called per request with the recorded request. Defaults to an empty 200.

StubStepFetch

// `no-check`: the assertion is the point, and a doc example may not import a
// test runner — the same reason `createToolContext`'s example opts out.
import { stubStepFetch } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const sync = stubStepFetch(() => ({ body: { text: "hello there" } }));
// … call the step …
expect(sync.calls[0]?.headers.Authorization).toBe("sk-test");
sync.restore();

stubStepInfo(step): object

Answer stepInfo() for the step under test, so a body’s RETRY branch is reachable from a spec.

A step that degrades on its last attempt has two paths and a spec could only ever take one: outside a run stepInfo() answers undefined, which a body reads as “not retrying”. So the branch that exists precisely for the case that goes wrong was the branch no test could enter — and it is the one whose failure is quiet, since a body that mis-reads the ceiling degrades early on every run and still returns an answer.

import { stubStepInfo } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { onTestFinished, expect, test } from "vitest";
declare function summarizeChapter(text: string): Promise<string>;
test("falls back to the cheap model on the last attempt", async () => {
const stub = stubStepInfo({ attempt: 3, maxAttempts: 3 });
onTestFinished(stub.restore);
expect(await summarizeChapter("")).toContain("");
});

isLastAttempt is DERIVED from the two numbers rather than accepted, for the reason the real reader derives it: a fake that let a spec set attempt: 1 and isLastAttempt: true would let a body pass against a state no run can be in.

Publishing REPLACES, so a spec that forgets to restore leaves this answering the next file’s steps — the same rule stubReporter follows, and the same remedy.

number

1-based. Defaults to 1.

number

Defaults to whichever is larger of 3 (the SDK’s own default) and attempt.

string

Defaults to "step".

object

() => void


stubTranscribe(options?): StubTranscribe

Answer AssemblyAI’s transcription endpoints in memory, and record what was sent.

Covers all four calls — the async trio (stepTranscribeUpload, stepTranscribeSubmit, stepTranscribePoll) and stepTranscribeSync — so a workflow that uploads, submits, polls and reads is testable end to end without naming upload_url, audio_duration or status: "completed" anywhere in the spec.

What it does NOT do is stand in for the upload STORE: stepTranscribeUpload streams the recording out of the app’s own store, so a spec still publishes one with stubUploads. The two fakes fill different slots and compose.

StubTranscribeOptions

StubTranscribe

A whole async job, in one line of setup

// `no-check`: the workflow under test is in another file, which is the point.
import { stubTranscribe, stubUploads } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const uploads = stubUploads({ upl_1: new Uint8Array(5000) });
const provider = stubTranscribe({ text: "we ship tuesday", durationSec: 42 });
expect(await transcribeRecording("upl_1")).toBe("we ship tuesday");
// The file really streamed: `stubStepFetch` drains the body into bytes.
expect(provider.calls.find((call) => call.leg === "upload")?.body).toBeInstanceOf(Uint8Array);
provider.restore();
uploads.restore();

A rate limit, classified by the SDK rather than by the fake

const provider = stubTranscribe({
failure: { leg: "sync", status: 429, retryAfterSeconds: 30 },
});
// `toStepError` reads `retryable` and `retryAfter` off the real TranscribeError.
await expect(transcribeSegment("upl_1", segment)).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(RetryableError);

stubUploads(files, options?): StubUploads

Publish an in-memory upload store, so a step that calls stepReadUpload can be tested without a server.

A step reads uploads through a process-wide slot rather than dialling anything, which is what makes this possible at all: a spec supplies its own bytes and the step under test is unchanged.

Returns a StubUploadsrestore, plus what a step WROTE. Calling restore in an afterEach is not optional; a store left published makes the next file’s steps read this one’s bytes, which is the kind of cross-file leak that presents as a passing test somewhere else.

Readonly<Record<string, StubUpload>>

Keyed by upload id — the same string a run input would carry.

StubUploadsOptions

StubUploads

import { stubUploads } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
const uploads = stubUploads({ upl_1: new Uint8Array([1, 2, 3]) });
// … call the step …
uploads.restore();
// A streamed upload mid-flight: `stepReadUpload` comes back short and
// `stepUploadInfo(...).complete` is false, which is what a polling body sees.
const firstHalf = new Uint8Array([1, 2]);
stubUploads({ upl_2: { bytes: firstHalf, complete: false } }).restore();

What a step wrote, without reading it back through the slot

const uploads = stubUploads({}, { writable: true });
// … call the step …
expect(uploads.writes.map((one) => one.name)).toEqual(["summary.wav"]);

toolInputIssues(agent, name, value): Promise<readonly StandardSchemaIssue[] | undefined>

The issues the tool name’s input schema found in value, or undefined.

The negative half of parseToolInput — the assertion behind “a mood outside the enum is refused by the schema”, which is the one thing standing between an LLM’s untyped tool call and the tool body.

ToolBearingAgent

string

unknown

Promise<readonly StandardSchemaIssue[] | undefined>

When the agent declares no such tool, or when it declares no inputSchema. A tool that takes no arguments accepts anything, and saying so out loud beats answering undefined — which reads as “accepted”.

import { toolInputIssues } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
expect(await toolInputIssues(agentDef, "recommend", { mood: "melancholy" })).toBeDefined();

toolOf(agent, name): ToolDef<ToolInputSchema>

The tool name is declared under, or a throw naming the ones that are.

A tool is a FILE, so agent.ts’s default export declares no tools at all — import the agent as DEPLOYED, exactly as this example does and as every shipped template’s spec does: virtual:aai/agent under vitest, or deployedAgent (@alexkroman1/aai/testing) under any other runner. Handing this the authored def directly is the common mistake, and it fails with “(none)”.

ToolBearingAgent

string

ToolDef<ToolInputSchema>

import agentDef from "virtual:aai/agent";
import { toolOf } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { expect } from "vitest";
expect(toolOf(agentDef, "add_item").description).toContain("cart");

toolRunner(agent): ToolRunner

runTool bound to one agent — the run(...) a spec actually calls.

A spec drives one agent, so agentDef is the same in every call and the name is the thing that varies. Every shipped template therefore opened with the same wrapper:

const run = (name: string, argsOrCtx?: Record<string, unknown> | ToolContext, ctx?: ToolContext) =>
runTool(agentDef, name, argsOrCtx, ctx);

Ten of them, and runTool’s own documentation named that wrapper as how every template reaches it — which is the point at which the wrapper is part of the API and belongs in it. const run = toolRunner(agentDef); is the same thing in one line.

The union is what is worth removing, not the line. A spec that writes the signature out has to restate Record<string, unknown> | ToolContext to forward both of runTool’s shapes — arguments, or the context in their place for a tool that takes none — and a spec that narrows it to (name: string, args: Record<string, unknown>) has quietly given up the second shape. Four templates had; three of those then passed {} by hand where the whole point of the shorter form is not having to. Binding the agent keeps the union in one place, where it stays right.

The runner is stateless and holds only the agent, so one per spec file at the top level is the shape: each call still defaults to a FRESH context, i.e. a distinct session with empty slots. Pass a context explicitly wherever the second call is meant to see the first call’s work — see runTool.

ToolBearingAgent

ToolRunner

import agentDef from "virtual:aai/agent";
import { createToolContext, toolRunner } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
import { expect } from "vitest";
const run = toolRunner(agentDef);
expect(await run("add_item", { item: "apple" })).toEqual({ added: "apple" });
// No arguments, one session shared across the two calls.
const ctx = createToolContext();
await run("add_item", { item: "apple" }, ctx);
expect(await run("view_order", ctx)).toEqual({ items: ["apple"] });

A runner over an agent with NO tools is refused HERE, rather than at the first run(...). A tool is a file, so agent.ts’s default export declares an empty table and every call through such a runner fails identically — the mistake is the argument on this line, and reporting it at a call site several dozen lines away names the symptom instead. It is the one shape that cannot be a legitimate runner: a runner exists to reach tools by name, and there are no names to reach. Reach for toolOf or runTool directly if a spec really means to assert on an empty table.

Sealed

What expectDeployable hands back: the RESOLVED config a deploy carries, narrowed to the fields a starter spec asserts on.

Not the whole AgentConfig, on purpose. That type is inferred from the canonical config SCHEMA, so returning it put the schema — every serializable agent field, each with its own validation shape — into this subpath’s contract, and a new agent field moved a TEST helper’s hash. These are the fields the shipped specs read; the object returned is the real config, so a spec that needs one more can read it off toAgentConfig (@alexkroman1/aai/manifest) directly.

mode is always present: expectDeployable refuses a conversion that derived none.

readonly optional builtinTools?: readonly BuiltinTool[]

The builtins the agent declares (absent: the default surface).

readonly optional llm?: DeployedStage

The LLM stage — declared, or the injected default in pipeline mode.

readonly optional mcpServers?: Readonly<Record<string, Readonly<Record<string, unknown>>>>

The MCP servers whose tools join the agent’s own, by key.

readonly mode: "s2s" | "text" | "pipeline"

The session mode the conversion derived.

readonly name: string

The name the platform lists the agent under.

readonly optional requiredEnv?: readonly string[]

The env var names a deploy preflights.

readonly optional s2s?: DeployedStage

The speech-to-speech descriptor, for an s2s agent.

readonly optional stt?: DeployedStage

The STT stage — declared, or the injected default in pipeline mode.

readonly systemPrompt: string

The system prompt a deploy carries — the author’s string, or the framework default when there is none. A RESOLVER is not carried (it cannot be serialized), so an agent with one reads the default here.

readonly optional text?: true

true for a text agent.

readonly optional tts?: DeployedStage

The TTS stage — declared, or the injected default in pipeline mode.

readonly optional turnDetection?: string

Who ends the caller’s turn — "manual" for push-to-talk.

readonly optional usageLimits?: object

The session’s token budget, when it declares one.

readonly optional totalTokens?: number


Sealed

One provider stage of a DeployedConfig — the descriptor as it will be deployed: its kind, and its options exactly as serialized.

readonly kind: string

The provider the stage resolves through, e.g. "assemblyai".

readonly optional options?: Readonly<Record<string, unknown>>

The descriptor’s options, as they cross the wire.


What scriptedToolContext answers: the context to run tools against, and the two fakes it was built from, for asserting what each was asked.

ctx: TestToolContext

Pass to runTool/toolRunner, or straight to a tool’s execute.

desk: StubDelegate

The ctx.delegate fake — desk.calls is every subagent run the tools asked for.

model: StubGenerate

The ctx.generate fake — model.calls is every prompt the tools sent.


One ctx.send(event, data) call that would REACH the client, as recorded by createToolContext — see the send default for what is left out.

data: unknown

event: string


A fake ctx.delegate: the function to pass, and what it was asked.

calls: StubDelegateCall[]

Every call, in order.

delegate: DelegateFn

Pass as delegate to createToolContext.


One ctx.delegate call, as recorded by stubDelegate.

options: DelegateOptions

The whole options object, for asserting context and maxSteps.

subagent: SubagentDef

The subagent that was asked.

task: string

The task it was given.


A fake gateway: the fetch to install, and what it was asked.

calls: StubGatewayCall[]

Every request, in call order.

fetch: (url, init?) => Promise<Response>

Install with vi.stubGlobal("fetch", gateway.fetch).

string | URL | Request

RequestInit

Promise<Response>


One request a StubGateway answered.

body: Record<string, unknown>

The whole decoded request body, for asserting model, temperature, …

headers: Record<string, string>

The request headers, lower-cased.

Worth asserting rather than assuming: the gateway is OpenAI-compatible and takes the key as a Bearer, where AssemblyAI’s streaming sockets take it raw — and getting that backwards is a 401 that reads like a wrong key.

prompt: string

The user message — what the step actually asked.

system: string | undefined

The system instruction, or undefined when the step sent none.

url: string

The endpoint the call went to, so a spec can assert the gateway URL.


Options for stubGateway.

optional headers?: Record<string, string>

Extra response headers — Retry-After is the one specs reach for.

optional status?: number

HTTP status to answer with. Defaults to 200. A non-2xx answers with an error body, which is what stepGenerate (@alexkroman1/aai/step) quotes back in its StepGenerateError.


A gateway answer for a stepFetch-published slot, plus what it was asked.

calls: StubGatewayCall[]

Every completion request this route answered, DECODED, in call order.

route: (request) => StubStepAnswer | undefined

Answers a completion request and undefined for anything else, so the caller composes it: ?? { body: html } for a flow that also fetches a page, ?? someThrow() for one where an unexpected request is a finding, or straight into stubTranscribe’s otherwise.

StubStepRequest

StubStepAnswer | undefined


A fake ctx.generate: the function to pass, and what it was asked.

calls: StubGenerateCall[]

Every call, in order.

generate: GenerateFn

Pass as generate to createToolContext.


One ctx.generate call, as recorded by stubGenerate.

options: GenerateOptions

The whole options object, for asserting llm, temperature, schema, …

prompt: string

The user prompt — what the tool actually asked.

system: string | undefined

The system instruction, or undefined when the call carried none.


A fake stepDelegate: the calls it recorded, and the slot to give back.

restore(): void

Unpublish the runner.

Calling it in an afterEach is not optional — a stub left published makes the next file’s steps delegate into this one’s log, which is the kind of cross-file leak that presents as a passing test somewhere else.

void

calls: StubDelegateCall[]

Every call, in order — the same log stubDelegate keeps.

ProjectFiles = object

What the BUILD lowers onto an agent.ts default export — the files beside it that a deployed agent runs with and a spec has to apply itself.

Both fields are optional and at least one must be present: an empty object is a call that does nothing, which is the shape of a forgotten argument rather than of a project with no files.

readonly optional systemPrompt?: string

import prompt from "./system-prompt.md?raw".

Omit it for a project with no system-prompt.md. Pass it even when agent.ts imports the file itself — whether it composes a string out of it or closes over it in a systemPrompt resolver, the def is left exactly as the author built it, so a spec never has to know which of the three shapes its own project uses.

readonly optional tools?: ToolModules

import.meta.glob("./tools/*.ts", { eager: true }), written at the CALL SITE — see the module doc for why it cannot be a directory string.

Omit it for a project with no tools/ directory. Passing an EMPTY glob is an error, not a no-op: see deployedAgent.


RecordedSleep = object

One wait the body asked for — and did NOT take.

optional correlationId?: string

label: string

The wait’s label — its identity in a real run’s journal, and the field a case asserting a SCHEDULE actually wants: a body with two waits is telling you WHICH one it reached, which a duration cannot.

until: number | Date

Exactly what the body passed: milliseconds, or a Date.


RecordedStep = object

One step the body reached, as the recorder saw it.

optional maxAttempts?: number

What the body asked for, or undefined when it passed no options.

name: string


RunSnapshotOverrides<R> = Partial<WorkflowRunBase> & { status?: "pending" | "running"; } | { output: R; status: "completed"; } | { error: string; status: "failed"; } | { status: "cancelled"; }

What createRunSnapshot accepts: the shared fields, plus whatever the chosen status requires.

The status-bearing half mirrors WorkflowRunSnapshot’s own union, so asking for status: "completed" without an output is a compile error rather than a fixture that lies.

R = unknown

The workflow’s return type, when the caller names it.


ScriptedToolContextOptions = Omit<ToolContextOverrides, "generate" | "delegate"> & object

What scriptedToolContext takes: stubGenerate’s script as generate, stubDelegate’s as delegate, and any other field of the context — sessionId, env, workflows — as createToolContext takes it.

Either script may be omitted: the fake is still built, so model.calls and desk.calls are always there to assert on, and a call it was not scripted for rejects naming the route it lacked — which is a spec that drifted from its tool, not a case to paper over.

An intersection ALIAS rather than an interface extends, because TypeDoc renders an interface’s inherited members with their ORIGINAL doc comments — ToolContext’s, whose {@link}s resolve on the root entry and not on this one, which failed the docs build as three unresolved links.

optional delegate?: StubDelegateScript

The script stubDelegate takes — { reply }, or { routes } keyed by subagent name.

optional generate?: StubGenerateScript

The script stubGenerate takes — { reply }, or { routes } keyed by system prompt.


StepRoute = (request) => StubStepAnswer | undefined

One leg of a step’s outside world: answers the requests it recognises and undefined for everything else, so legs compose.

The shape stubGatewayRoute already hands back, named so a spec writing its own leg (a page fetch, a provider’s job API) writes the same thing.

StubStepRequest

StubStepAnswer | undefined


StepUnmatched = "throw" | "notFound" | StepRoute

What an unrecognised request means.

  • "throw" (the default) — a finding. A step asked for something the spec did not set up, and the test should say so at the call.
  • "notFound" — a real 404, for a spec whose subject IS how a flow handles one.
  • a StepRoute — the fallback leg, for “anything else is this page”.

StubDelegateReply = string | { complaint?: string; revisions?: number; steps?: number; text: string; toolCalls?: readonly SubagentToolCall[]; }

What one route answers with.

A bare string is the subagent’s final text with an empty cost report, which is what a tool that only reads text wants. The object form fills in steps and toolCalls for a tool that narrates the wait.

string


{ complaint?: string; revisions?: number; steps?: number; text: string; toolCalls?: readonly SubagentToolCall[]; }

optional complaint?: string

Stage a run the subagent’s GUARDRAIL never accepted: the complaint the real runtime returns beside the last rejected attempt.

Its presence is what makes the result’s accepted false — the two cannot be staged apart, because in the runtime they cannot occur apart. A spec cannot describe an unaccepted answer with no reason, and a caller reading complaint on an accepted one would be reading a field that is never set.

optional revisions?: number

How many times a guardrail sent an answer back. Defaults to 0.

optional steps?: number

text: string

optional toolCalls?: readonly SubagentToolCall[]


StubDelegateRoute = StubDelegateReply | ((call) => StubDelegateReply)

How a route answers: a fixed reply, or a function of the call — the function form being what a route asked more than once (a subagent run per document) needs in order to shift its own script.


StubDelegateScript = { reply: StubDelegateRoute; routes?: never; } | { reply?: never; routes: Readonly<Record<string, StubDelegateRoute>>; }

Everything stubDelegate and stubStepDelegate accept: ONE route answering every delegation, or a table of routes keyed by subagent name — each under a key that says which.

The same two shapes StubGenerateScript takes, for the same reason: a bare “a table, or a reply” union is told apart at runtime by the reply’s shape, so a subagent named text could never be routed and a reply object could be read as a table. Named, there is nothing to guess.

{ reply: StubDelegateRoute; routes?: never; }

readonly reply: StubDelegateRoute

Answers EVERY delegation, whichever subagent it names.

readonly optional routes?: never


{ reply?: never; routes: Readonly<Record<string, StubDelegateRoute>>; }

readonly optional reply?: never

readonly routes: Readonly<Record<string, StubDelegateRoute>>

One route per subagent, keyed by its name. A delegation naming no route rejects, naming the subagent.


StubEmitted = object

One chunk stepEmit() wrote, and the stream it went to.

chunk: unknown

The value, exactly as the step passed it.

namespace: string

The stream named at the call site.


StubGenerateReply = string | { object: unknown; text?: string; }

What one route answers with.

A bare string is text (the schemaless shape); an object is structured output, and its text defaults to the JSON the real host would have returned — a schema call’s text IS the stringified object, so a fake that left it empty would differ from production in the one place a caller might read it.


StubGenerateRoute = StubGenerateReply | ((call) => StubGenerateReply)

How a route answers: a fixed reply, or a function of the call.

The function form is what a route with a QUEUE needs — a grader asked once per document, an executor asked once per turn — since it can shift its own script.


StubGenerateScript = { reply: StubGenerateRoute; routes?: never; } | { reply?: never; routes: Readonly<Record<string, StubGenerateRoute>>; }

Everything stubGenerate accepts: ONE route answering every call, or a table of routes keyed by system prompt — each under a key that says which.

import { stubGenerate } from "@alexkroman1/aai/testing";
stubGenerate({ reply: "The documented answer." });
stubGenerate({ routes: { "You grade documents.": { object: { score: 1 } } } });

Why two keys rather than “a record, or a route”. The bare form was a union of a route table and a single reply, told apart at runtime by whether the object had an object key — so stubGenerate({ text: "…" }) type-checked as a table with one route named text and rejected every call. A misuse arm in the type was meant to refuse it, and could not SPEAK: the reply arm’s optional text out-scored it, so tsc printed “Property ‘object’ is missing” — the wrong remedy. With the shape named, there is nothing to disambiguate: { reply: { text } } is a reply, and a function under reply is a computed route, never mistaken for the seam itself (see ToolContextOverrides.generate).

Named because it is written down in three places — that function, the generate field of createToolContext’s overrides, and ScriptedToolContextOptions — and a union restated at each of them is a union that drifts.

{ reply: StubGenerateRoute; routes?: never; }

readonly reply: StubGenerateRoute

Answers EVERY call, whatever its system prompt.

readonly optional routes?: never


{ reply?: never; routes: Readonly<Record<string, StubGenerateRoute>>; }

readonly optional reply?: never

readonly routes: Readonly<Record<string, StubGenerateRoute>>

One route per model ROLE, keyed by the call’s system prompt. A call whose system prompt names no route rejects, naming it; "" is the route for a call that carries none.


StubReporter = object

What stubReporter returns.

emitted: StubEmitted[]

Every chunk stepEmit() wrote, oldest first.

lines: string[]

Every line stepReport() wrote, oldest first.

restore: () => void

Unpublish. Call it in an afterEach — see stubReporter.

void


StubSpeech = object

What stubSpeech returns: the call log, and how to put the slot back.

restore(): void

Unpublish the synthesizer.

Calling it in an afterEach is not optional — a stub left published makes the next file’s steps speak into this one’s log, which is the kind of cross-file leak that presents as a passing test somewhere else.

void

calls: StubSpeechCall[]

Every call, in order.


StubSpeechCall = object

One stepSpeak call, as stubSpeech records it.

apiKey: string

The credential stepSpeak resolved out of the step env.

language: string | undefined

The language code, or undefined when the caller named none.

sampleRate: number

The rate the audio was asked for at.

text: string

The text handed to the synthesizer, trimmed the way stepSpeak trims it.

voice: string

The voice, with stepSpeak’s default already filled in.


StubSpeechOptions = object

What stubSpeech may be told.

optional error?: Error

Fail instead of speaking, with this error.

The half a spec cannot write by leaving the slot empty: an unpublished slot is “no synthesizer here”, which is a different sentence and a different branch from a provider that answered and refused.

optional pcmBytes?: number

Bytes of PCM to answer with, per call.

Defaults to STUB_SPEECH_PCM_BYTES, which is enough that the WAV stepSpeak frames has a plausible duration and a spec asserting on one gets a number rather than zero. A caller that cares about the exact duration sets this: at the default 24 kHz mono 16-bit, one second is 48,000 bytes.


StubStepAnswer = Response | { body?: unknown; headers?: Record<string, string>; status?: number; }

What a stubStepFetch answer may be: a whole Response, or the { status, body, headers } shorthand that JSON-encodes body.

Named because the transcription fake (stubTranscribe) hands its otherwise handler the same vocabulary, and a spec routing by URL should not have to restate the union to write one.


StubStepFetch = object

What stubStepFetch returns.

calls: StubStepRequest[]

Every request the step made, in order.

restore: () => void

Unpublish. Call it in an afterEach — see stubStepFetch.

void


StubStepRequest = object

One request a stubStepFetch recorder captured.

body: Uint8Array | string | undefined

The body as sent.

A STREAMING body (an async iterable — see StepFetchInit.body) is DRAINED into a Uint8Array before it reaches a spec, so an assertion reads the bytes that went out rather than an iterator it would have to consume itself — and consuming it in the spec would be consuming the one the request was going to send.

headers: Record<string, string>

method: string

url: string


StubTranscribe = object

What stubTranscribe returns.

restore(): void

Unpublish.

Not optional — a stepFetch left published answers the next file’s steps. installStubTranscribe (@alexkroman1/aai/testing/vitest) is this with the registration already done.

void

calls: StubTranscribeCall[]

Every request that reached the fake, in order, each tagged with its leg.


StubTranscribeCall = StubStepRequest & object

One request stubTranscribe answered, with the leg it belonged to.

leg: StubTranscribeLeg

Which of the four calls this was, or "other".


StubTranscribeFailure = object

A refusal to stage, as an HTTP answer the SDK then classifies.

Deliberately not a TranscribeError: the verdict a spec cares about (retryable, retryAfter) is computed by transcribeFailure from the status and the headers, so staging the STATUS exercises that classification and staging the error would replace it. 429 and 5xx are the transient pair, 408 counts, and everything else is terminal — see isTransientStatus on @alexkroman1/aai/step.

optional leg?: StubTranscribeLeg | readonly StubTranscribeLeg[]

Which leg refuses. Defaults to ALL FOUR, which is what a spec asserting “this flow reports a 429 as retryable” wants — it does not care which call met the limit.

optional message?: string

What the body says went wrong.

Sent as { error }, which both endpoints’ readers understand — the async API’s own spelling, and one of the three transcribeFailure accepts.

optional retryAfterSeconds?: number

Seconds to put in Retry-After.

The field a fan-out’s behaviour turns on: four segments that hit a per-minute limit together re-collect their 429s on a backoff nobody chose unless the header is honoured, so a spec about batching needs to be able to send one.

optional status?: number

The status to answer. Defaults to 500.


StubTranscribeLeg = "upload" | "submit" | "poll" | "sync" | "other"

Which transcription call a request was.

"other" is anything that is not one of the four — a model call, a feed download — which reaches the otherwise handler rather than this fake.


StubTranscribeOptions = object

What stubTranscribe may be told.

optional audioUrl?: string

What the upload leg answers with. Defaults to a fixed fake CDN URL.

optional durationSec?: number

The provider’s own duration measurement, in seconds. Defaults to 60.

optional failure?: StubTranscribeFailure

Refuse at the HTTP level. See StubTranscribeFailure.

optional jobError?: string

Fail the JOB rather than the request: the poll answers 200 with status: "error" and this reason.

A different branch from StubTranscribeOptions.failure and the one most likely to be got wrong in production code — the provider succeeded at answering and the answer is “no”. It is TERMINAL, and a flow that retried it would poll a dead job until its budget ran out.

optional jobIdPrefix?: string

Prefix for the job ids the submit leg mints. Defaults to "stub_transcript_", with a 1-based counter after it.

Minted rather than random for the reason stubUploads’s ids are: a spec asserting that a run journaled the job it later polled needs the id to be a value it can write down.

optional otherwise?: (request) => StubStepAnswer | undefined | Promise<StubStepAnswer | undefined>

Answer everything that is not a transcription call.

Publishing a stepFetch REPLACES, so a flow that transcribes AND calls a model cannot have two fakes installed — this is the seam for the second one. Returning undefined (or passing no handler) answers 404 with a body naming the URL, which is a better failure than an empty 200 a step would try to parse.

StubStepRequest

StubStepAnswer | undefined | Promise<StubStepAnswer | undefined>

optional pendingPolls?: number

How many polls answer “still working” before the job completes. Defaults to 0 — the first poll finds it done.

Counted PER JOB ID, so a flow that submits two jobs sees each of them take the same number of polls. Keep it small: a caller’s polling loop usually sleeps between polls, and outside a real run that wait is not one a spec should be taking.

optional text?: string | readonly string[]

The words a completed job or a sync request comes back with.

A list is consumed one per COMPLETED answer and the last repeats, matching stubGateway’s convention and for the same reason: a fan-out over segments wants a different line per segment, and a stub that ran out mid-fan-out would fail on the stub rather than on the code.

An EMPTY string is meaningful rather than a lazy default: the async API’s poll refuses it ("There is no speech in that recording", terminal), and the sync endpoint accepts it — a silent segment in a fan-out is ordinary. That asymmetry is real, and this is how a spec drives it.


StubUpload = Uint8Array | { bytes: Uint8Array; complete?: boolean; name?: string; type?: string; }

One file a stubUploads store answers for.

A bare Uint8Array is the common case and means “these bytes, no name”.

Uint8Array


{ bytes: Uint8Array; complete?: boolean; name?: string; type?: string; }

bytes: Uint8Array

optional complete?: boolean

Whether every byte is in. Defaults to true.

false stages a STREAMED upload that is still arriving, which is the state a step polling one has to handle and the only one where stepReadUpload legitimately comes back short. Being able to write that down is most of why this field exists: a body that treats a stalled size as the end returns a transcript of most of a recording and reports success, and a spec cannot catch that without an incomplete upload to hand it.

optional name?: string

optional type?: string


StubUploads = object

What stubUploads returns.

An OBJECT, like every other fake here (stubSpeech, stubReporter, stubStepFetch) — this one used to be the bare restore function, which made it the only stub in the family a spec had to remember was different, and left a spec asserting on a WRITE to round-trip through stepUploadInfo/stepReadUpload: the published slot, read back through the same seam the step wrote it through, to answer “did it write anything at all”.

read(id): StubUploadWrite | undefined

What is stored under id right now — a seeded file or one a step wrote.

Synchronous and outside the published slot, so a spec asserting on bytes does not have to await stepReadUpload through the very seam it is testing.

string

StubUploadWrite | undefined

restore(): void

Unpublish.

Not optional — a store left published makes the next file’s steps read this one’s bytes, which is the kind of cross-file leak that presents as a passing test somewhere else. installStubUploads (@alexkroman1/aai/testing/vitest) is this store with the registration already done.

void

writes: StubUploadWrite[]

Every file a step wrote, in write order.

Empty unless the store was opened { writable: true }, which is what makes the pair readable as an assertion: a read-only store cannot accept a write, so writes staying empty is the same fact as the step never having tried.


StubUploadsOptions = object

What stubUploads may be told beyond the files themselves.

optional idPrefix?: string

Prefix for the ids writes are given. Defaults to "upl_stub_", with a 1-based counter after it — upl_stub_1, upl_stub_2 — so the id a step returned is a value a spec can assert on rather than a fresh UUID.

optional writable?: boolean

Accept WRITES, so a step calling stepWriteUpload can be tested.

Off by default, and deliberately: a store that silently accepts writes it was not asked for cannot fail a spec whose step wrote a file nobody meant it to, and stepWriteUpload naming a read-only store is a better failure than an upload appearing from nowhere. What a step writes is readable through stepReadUpload/stepUploadInfo on the id it was given, like any other upload.


StubUploadWrite = object

One file a step WROTE into a stubUploads store.

bytes: Uint8Array

Every byte written, drained from the step’s stream.

id: string

The minted id the step was handed back — upl_stub_1, unless renamed.

name: string

The name the step declared, or "" when it named none.

type: string

The content type the step declared, or "".


TestToolContext = ToolContext & object

A ToolContext that records what its tools sent.

Assignable to ToolContext wherever one is required, so it passes straight to execute.

readonly desk: StubDelegate

The ctx.delegate fake — desk.calls is every subagent run the tools asked for. Present and wired on the same terms as TestToolContext.model.

readonly model: StubGenerate

The ctx.generate fake — model.calls is every prompt the tools sent.

Present on every context, so an assertion needs no null check, and WIRED whenever generate arrived as a script or as a fake. Given a bare function (or nothing at all) it is a fake nothing reaches: model.calls stays empty for the same reason TestToolContext.sent does when a test brings its own send spy — the seam belongs to the caller, and so does the log.

readonly sent: SentEvent[]

Events ctx.send would put on the wire, in call order. An event the runtime would drop (over the payload cap, an over-long name, no JSON form) is not here, for the same reason it is not in the browser.


ToolBearingAgent = object

The slice of an agent these helpers read: its tool table.

Structural rather than AgentDef, so a spec may pass the agent’s default export, a bare { tools } literal, or anything else carrying one.

readonly tools: Readonly<Record<string, ToolDef<ToolInputSchema>>>


ToolContextOverrides = object

What createToolContext accepts: a field per ToolContext field, each also taking undefined for one the caller does not have.

Not Partial<ToolContext>, and the difference is the whole point. Under exactOptionalPropertyTypes — which this repo and the scaffold both set — Partial<T> means sessionId?: string, a property that may be ABSENT but whose value may never be undefined. So a spec holding a string | undefined could not pass it, and the workaround it reached for instead was a conditional spread:

createToolContext({ generate, ...(sessionId ? { sessionId } : {}) });

Two shipped templates had that line byte-identical, and it is the exact shape this repo’s own guard-invariants rule 22 counts as debt — so the SDK’s signature was teaching the pattern its gates refuse. Adding | undefined to every field costs nothing (an explicit undefined and an absent key both fall through to the default, because createToolContext takes the overrides through omitUndefined before spreading them) and strictly widens what compiles.

Every field is NAMED rather than mapped over keyof ToolContext. A mapped type is one a reader cannot see the members of without expanding it, and one that silently grows a field when ToolContext does — which is the moment a test double should have to decide what its default is. testing.test-d.ts pins that the two key sets agree, so a new ToolContext field fails there rather than being unoverridable.

The two MODEL seams also accept the SCRIPT their fake is built from — see their own docs below.

optional deadlineAt?: ToolContext["deadlineAt"]

See ToolContext.deadlineAt. Defaults to the runtime’s tool deadline, from now.

optional delegate?: ToolContext["delegate"] | StubDelegateScript

A real ctx.delegate, or stubDelegate’s own SCRIPT — { reply } or { routes } keyed by subagent name. A function is the seam, on the same rule as generate above; the fake comes back on TestToolContext.desk.

optional desk?: StubDelegate

The stubDelegate twin of ToolContextOverrides.model.

optional env?: ToolContext["env"]

See ToolContext.env. Defaults to {}.

optional generate?: ToolContext["generate"] | StubGenerateScript

A real ctx.generate, or stubGenerate’s own SCRIPT — { reply } or { routes }.

A script is built into the fake here, so the two-step every spec wrote — stubGenerate(script), destructure, createToolContext({ generate }) — is one call, and the fake comes back on TestToolContext.model.

A FUNCTION in this position is always the seam itself, and nothing else can be one: a computed route is written { reply: (call) => … }, so it cannot be mistaken for a GenerateFn the way a bare function route used to be.

optional messages?: ToolContext["messages"]

See ToolContext.messages. Defaults to [].

optional model?: StubGenerate

A fake this spec built itself, to be exposed as TestToolContext.model — and, unless generate also names a function, INSTALLED as the seam.

The escape hatch under the script sugar: a caller holding a stubGenerate it wants to share across two contexts names it here rather than leaving ctx.model pointing at a fake nothing reaches.

optional random?: ToolContext["random"]

See ToolContext.random. Defaults to a SEEDED source.

optional send?: ToolContext["send"]

See ToolContext.send. Defaults to the recorder behind TestToolContext.sent.

optional sessionId?: ToolContext["sessionId"]

See ToolContext.sessionId. Defaults to a fresh id per call.

optional signal?: ToolContext["signal"]

See ToolContext.signal. Defaults to a signal that never aborts.

optional slots?: ToolContext["slots"]

See ToolContext.slots. Defaults to a fresh, empty, REAL slot store.

optional workflows?: ToolContext["workflows"]

See ToolContext.workflows. Defaults to a client whose every method rejects.


ToolRunner = (name, argsOrCtx?, ctx?) => Promise<unknown>

What toolRunner hands back: runTool with the agent already supplied.

Named so a caller can annotate a helper that takes one, and so the union in the second position is written down once here rather than at every call site that binds it.

string

InferSchemaOutput<ToolInputSchema> | ToolContext

ToolContext

Promise<unknown>


WorkflowContextOptions = object

What createWorkflowContext takes.

optional hooks?: Record<string, unknown>

Payloads for ctx.waitFor, by token.

A token that is absent THROWS rather than hanging, because a spec that hangs reports a timeout naming the runner instead of the missing payload.

optional now?: number | (() => number)

What ctx.now() answers — a fixed number, or a function called per reach.

Defaults to WORKFLOW_CONTEXT_NOW, a FIXED instant, so a body’s derived durations are constants a spec can write down. There is no journal here, so nothing is memoized: a function is called once per reach, which is what a spec asserting on two reads (a start and an end) wants.

optional random?: number | (() => number)

What ctx.random() answers. Defaults to a fixed 0.5.

optional results?: Record<string, unknown>

Results to answer particular steps with, by step NAME.

Takes precedence over running the step, so it works in both modes: with runSteps: true it stubs one expensive step and leaves the rest real, and with runSteps: false it is what makes a body whose control flow READS its steps drivable at all — planAngles returning undefined otherwise reaches the fan-out below it as a missing list.

Keyed by name rather than by occurrence: a step in a loop is one name, and a spec that needs the iterations to differ wants runSteps: true with the collaborator stubbed instead.

optional runId?: string

Defaults to "wrun_test".

optional runSteps?: boolean

Run each step’s fn, or only record that it was reached.

Defaults to true, which is what makes this drive a REAL body. Pass false when the subject is the policy or the order — a step that is not run needs no collaborator stubbed, so such a spec stays short.

Note a recorded-only step resolves undefined, so a body that reads its result will see one. That is the honest cost of not running it.

optional uuid?: string | (() => string)

What ctx.uuid() answers.

Defaults to a DISTINCT value per reach — "uuid-0", "uuid-1", … — because a body that mints two ids and gets one is a body whose bug the spec would hide. Not a real UUID, deliberately: a spec asserting on a shape rather than on a value is asserting on the fake.

optional workflow?: string

The declared key. Defaults to "test".


WorkflowContextRecorder = WorkflowContext & object

What createWorkflowContext answers: a real WorkflowContext plus its log.

readonly slept: RecordedSleep[]

Every ctx.sleep, in order.

readonly steps: RecordedStep[]

Every step reached, in the order the body reached them.

readonly waited: string[]

Every token ctx.waitFor was called with, in order.

const STUB_SPEECH_PCM_BYTES: 12000 = 12000

PCM bytes stubSpeech answers with when no size is named — ~0.25s at 24 kHz.


const WORKFLOW_CONTEXT_NOW: 1767225600000 = 1767225600000

The instant createWorkflowContext freezes ctx.now() at.

2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z. Exported so a spec computes an expected duration from it rather than copying the number.